Madsen v. Chrysler Corp.
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Bray v. QFA ROYALTIES LLC (United States District Court for the District of Colorado 2007)
- Associated Producers v. City of Independence, Mo. (District Court, W.D. Missouri 1986)
- Aba Distributors, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Adolph Coors Company, Cross-Appellee (8th Cir. 1981)
- 33 Flavors of Greater Delaware Valley, Inc. v. Bresler's 33 Flavors, Inc. (United States District Court for the District of Delaware 1979)
- Autohaus Brugger, Inc. v. Saab Motors, Inc., and Saab-Scania of America, Inc. (9th Cir. 1978)
- Kaiser v. Local No. 83 (9th Cir. 1978)
- Thayer Plymouth Center, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp. (Cal. Ct. App. 1967)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Chrysler Corporation and Chrysler Motors Corporation to reverse judgment and remand cause with directions to dismiss complaint on the grounds of mootness, and the answer of counsel for Clarence Madsen, et al. to said motion.
On consideration whereof, it is hereby ordered and adjudged by this Court that the final judgment in this cause entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, 261 F.Supp. 488, be, and the same is hereby vacated, and that this cause be, and the same is hereby remanded to the said District Court with directions to dismiss the complaint, without prejudice and without costs, the controversy being moot.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.