Doe v. Reivitz

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Doe v. Reivitz, 842 F.2d 194 (7th Cir. 1988)
1988 WL 24822

Doe v. Reivitz

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The court, sua sponte, amends the opinion in the above-entitled cause, issued September 28, 1987, 830 F.2d 1441 (7th Cir. 1987), by adding the following language to footnote 11 at page 1448 of the opinion:

After we issued our opinion in this case, we received a letter from plaintiffs’ counsel suggesting that some of the above-cited sections apply to the Wisconsin program since that program is not entirely a general WIN program. Neither the state nor the federal government, however, filed a petition for rehearing, and this portion of our statutory analysis remains applicable to the extent the program is a general WIN program. Further, nothing in the letter casts any doubt on the remainder of our analysis or on the result.

Reference

Full Case Name
J. DOE v. Linda REIVITZ and John Erickson, Defendants-Third-Party v. Otis BOWEN and Kay Wilmoth, Third-Party-Defendants
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published