Auriemma v. Rice

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit May 11, 1990

Auriemma v. Rice, 902 F.2d 1245 (7th Cir. 1990)

1990 WL 62016

Bauer, Coffey, Cudahy, Cummings, Easterbrook, Flaum, Kanne, Manion, Posner, Ripple, Wood

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

A majority of judges in active service have voted to rehear this case en banc. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that rehearing en banc be, and the same is hereby, GRANTED.

*1246IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment and opinion entered in this case on February 6, 1990, 895 F.2d 338, be, and are hereby, VACATED. This case will be reheard en banc on May 30, 1990 in the morning session.

Reference

Full Case Name: John AURIEMMA, Daniel Coll, Marshall Consadine, Renaldo Cozzi, Kenneth Curin, Russell Ditusa, Thomas Faragoi, Lawrence Forberg, John Hinchy, Kathryn Kajari, George Marcin, Patrick McDonough, Walter Murphy, John Rafter, Dominic Rizzi, James Stampnick, Thomas Walter and Roger Whalen v. Fred RICE, and City of Chicago
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published