U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 1994

John Lucille v. City of Chicago

John Lucille v. City of Chicago
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Decided September 22, 1994 · Cudahy, Flaum, Easterbrook
31 F.3d 546; 1994 WL 400907 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Thomas M. Arnett (argued), Chicago, IL, for plaintiff-appellant., Mary L. Smith, CC, Office of the Corp. Counsel, James D. Montgomery, Montgomery & Associates, Lawrence Rosenthal, DCC, Jean Dobrer, ACC (argued), Kelly R. Welsh, ACC, Nancy Van Allen, Benna R. Solomon, Susan S. Sher, Office of the Corp. Counsel, Appeals Div., Arthur N. Christie, Burke & Ryan, Chicago, IL, for defendant-appellee.

John Lucille v. City of Chicago

Cases that cite this one

59 later published cases cite this decision. The 23 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Concurring Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.