City of Chicago v. FCC

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Per Curiam

City of Chicago v. FCC

Opinion

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Nos. 98-2729, 98-2901, 98-2940, 98-3064, 98-3078, 98-3079, 98-3267 & 98-3474

CITY OF CHICAGO; TEXAS COALITION OF CITIES ON FRANCHISED UTILITIES ISSUES; CITY OF ST. LOUIS; CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF MERIDIAN and CITY OF EAST LANSING, MICHIGAN; ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNICATIONS DEMOCRACY, ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY MEDIA, and CHICAGO ACCESS CORPORATION; NATIONAL CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION, INC.; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS OFFICERS AND ADVISORS (NATOA); and MICHIGAN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION,

Petitioners,

and

21ST CENTURY TELECOM GROUP, INC.; MICHIGAN COALITION TO PROTECT PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY FROM TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENCROACHMENTS; and GREATER METRO TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSORTIUM,

Intervening Petitioners,

v.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondents.

and

ENTERTAINMENT CONNECTIONS, INC.; RCN TELECOM SERVICES, INC.; and WEDGEWOOD COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY,

Intervening Respondents.

Petitions for Review of an Order of the Federal Communications Commission. No. 98-111

Before the Court on Petitions for Rehearing and Petitions for Rehearing En Banc

Decided March 22, 2000

Per Curiam. The court’s opinion was issued in these consolidated cases on December 7, 1999. Subsequently, numerous petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc were filed. The original panel has unanimously voted to deny rehearing. A vote was requested on the petitions for rehearing en banc. A majority of the judges entitled to vote voted to deny the petitions for rehearing en banc. Circuit Judges Rovner, Diane P. Wood, and Williams voted to grant rehearing en banc.

Accordingly, the petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are DENIED. The panel, however, amends its opinion of December 7, 1999, as follows:

The last two sentences of the first paragraph of the opinion are deleted and replaced by:

After the FCC ruled in the ECI case, several petitions for review were filed in various circuits. The first one filed was in this circuit, and after the FCC lodged the record here the remaining petitions were transferred to us under 28 U.S.C. sec. 2112(a)(5). We consolidated all of the petitions for decision.

Reference

Status
Published