Central States Areas v. Kroger Company
Central States Areas v. Kroger Company
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Argued February 17, 2000 Decided February 2, 2001
Before Hon. HARLINGTON WOOD, JR., Circuit Judge Hon. JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge
Nos. 99-2257, 99-3014 CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND, Appeal from the United States SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, District Court for the and HOWARD MCDOUGALL, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
Plaintiffs-Appellees, No. 93 C 3669 John F. Grady, Judge. v. KROGER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
ORDER The court, on its own motion, corrects an error in the text of the original opinion. See Central States, Area Pension Fund v. Kroger, 226 F.3d 903 (7th Cir. 2000). On page 910 of the published opinion, column 2, line 6, the term “de novo” ought to read “deferentially.” As the remainder of the court's discussion Nos. 99-2257, 99-3014 Page 2
makes clear, the correct standard was applied in the opinion and this slip of the pen did not impact the court's analysis or the result in the case.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.