IN Bell Tele Co v. McCarty, William D.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Per Curiam

IN Bell Tele Co v. McCarty, William D.

Opinion

fittm’teh flutes Qtuurt of gppealg

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

April 5, 2004 Before Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

Nos. 03-1123, 03-1122 and 03-1124

INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Appeals from the United States INCORPORATED d/b/ a Ameritech Indiana, District Court for the Southern

Plaintz'fprpellant, Cross—Appellee, District of Indiana,

v. Indianapolis Division.

WILLIAM D. MCCARTY, DAVID W. HADLEY, and No. 01 C 1690 DAVID E. ZEIGNER, in their capacity as Commissioners of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Larry J. McKinney, Commission and not as individuals, Chief Judge.

Defendants—Appellees, Cross-Appellants, and

AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF INDIANA, GP, and TCG INDIANAPOLIS,

Defindants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants.

ORDER

The slip opinion issued in the above-entitled cause on March 5, 2004, is amended as follows:

Page 20, Section 2, first sentence, beginning at the fourth line, delete “in derogation of the Act” and replace with “was in error.”

Nos. 03-1123, 03-1122 & 03-1124 Page 2

Further, on consideration of the petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc, no judge in active service has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc1 and all of the judges on the original panel have voted to deny rehearing. It is, therefore, ORDERED that rehearing and rehearing en banc are DENIED.

]Chief Judge J 061 M. Flaum, Judge Kenneth F. Ripple, Judge llana Diamond Rovner and Judge Ann Claire Williams did not participate in the consideration of this petition.

Reference

Status
Published