U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 2004

Pease, Christopher v. Production Work 707

Pease, Christopher v. Production Work 707
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Decided October 25, 2004 · Per Curiam

Pease, Christopher v. Production Work 707

Opinion

3.51mith 0%.:th QInurf Hf Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 October 25, 2004 Before Hon. WHLIMdJ. BmmR, Circuit Judge Hon. FRMM H. EASHRBMMK, Circuit Judge Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge CHRISTOPHER PEASE, VINCE VITI, WILLARD Appeal from the United BmmE, and MKmAmJGEMh States District Court Plaintiffs-Appellants, for the Northern District of Illinois, No, 04-1928 v, Eastern Division.

PRODUCTION WORKERS UNION OF CHICAGO AND NO- 02 C3 6756 VICINITY LOCAL 707; RANDALL INDUSTRIES, James F- HOJ-derman, INC.; and RANDALL RENTS OF INDIANA, INC., L7Udge- Defendants—Appellees.

Order The sentence at page 4 of the opinion, reading "Walker testified, without contradiction, that he had been promised when he transferred to the sales position that he could go back to driving if the new job did not pan out." is amended to read: "There was uncontradicted testimony that both Randall and Local assured Walker, before he transferred to the sales position, that he could go back to driving if the new job did not pan out."

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.