ORDER

Back in April 2004, the district court, having awarded judgment to the defendants, awarded court costs to them. The plaintiffs sought reconsideration of the award of costs, which the district court turned down in August of that year. In November, we affirmed the judgment for the defendants in part and reversed in part. Before us now is the plaintiffs’ appeal from the denial of their motion for reconsideration. None of the parties seems aware that the award of costs fell with our reversal. The district court should make a new award after the proceedings on remand are complete.

The award of costs is therefore

Vacated.