United States v. Romero, Ralph
United States v. Romero, Ralph
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
August 18, 2005
Before
Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge
Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge
Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United Plaintiff-Appellee, States District Court for the Northern District of Indi- No. 03-4211 v. ana, South Bend Division.
RALPH A. ROMERO, No. 3:03-CR-18 RM Defendant-Appellant. Robert L. Miller, Jr., Chief Judge.
Order
On limited remand under United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 481-85 (7th Cir. 2005), the district judge concluded that he would not have imposed a lower sentence had he known that the Guidelines are advisory.
In response to our invitation, the parties have filed memoranda. Romero does not contend that the sentence he received--420 months' imprisonment for distribut- ing more than 50 tons of marijuana--is "unreasonable," the post-Booker standard of appellate review. Instead he contends that application to him of Justice Breyer's opinion for the remedial majority in Booker would violate ex post facto principles applied through the due process clause. That position was considered and rejected in United States v. Jamison, No. 05-1045 (7th Cir. July 20, 2005). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished