United States v. Locke, Diedre
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
United States v. Locke, Diedre, 160 F. App'x 518 (7th Cir. 2005)
United States v. Locke, Diedre
Opinion
ORDER
On limited remand under United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005), the district court responded that under an advisory guidelines regime it would not have imposed a different sentence. We invited the parties to file memoranda concerning the district court’s response but only the government did so. Locke’s sentence of twelve months and one day, which is at the bottom of the guideline range, is presumptively reasonable under United States v. Mykytiuk, 415 F.3d 606 (7th Cir. 2005), and by not responding she has failed to rebut that presumption. Our independent review does not suggest the sentence is unreasonable and, thus, we AFFIRM the judgement.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Diedre LOCKE, Defendant-Appellant
- Status
- Unpublished