U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 2005

United States v. Locke, Diedre

United States v. Locke, Diedre
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Decided December 22, 2005 · Hon, Easterbrook, Kanne, Williams
160 F. App'x 518

United States v. Locke, Diedre

Opinion

ORDER

On limited remand under United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005), the district court responded that under an advisory guidelines regime it would not have imposed a different sentence. We invited the parties to file memoranda concerning the district court’s response but only the government did so. Locke’s sentence of twelve months and one day, which is at the bottom of the guideline range, is presumptively reasonable under United States v. Mykytiuk, 415 F.3d 606 (7th Cir. 2005), and by not responding she has failed to rebut that presumption. Our independent review does not suggest the sentence is unreasonable and, thus, we AFFIRM the judgement.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.