United States v. Grap, Daniel D.
United States v. Grap, Daniel D.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
January 18, 2006
Before
Hon. RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge
Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge
Hon. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge
No. 04-2033
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff–Appellee, Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Western Division
v. No. 03 CR 50038
DANIEL D. GRAP, Philip G. Reinhard, Defendant–Appellant. Judge.
ORDER
This Court ordered a limited remand so the district court could state on the record whether the sentence remains appropriate now that United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), has limited the Federal Sentencing Guidelines to advisory status. See United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005). The district court determined that it would impose the same sentence upon Grap, now knowing that the Guidelines’ are merely advisory. We invited the parties to file memoranda addressing the appropriate disposition of the appeal in light of the district court’s determination, but only the government did so. No. 04-2033 Page 2
Sentences properly calculated under the sentencing guidelines are presumptively reasonable. United States v. Mykytiuk, 415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir. 2005). Grap’s failure to file a response leaves that presumption unrebutted. His sentence does not appear to be unreasonable and is therefore AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished