United States v. Gilmore, Harry

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Per Curiam

United States v. Gilmore, Harry

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

August 1, 2006

Before

Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ] Appeals from the United Plaintiff-Appellee, ] States District Court for ] the Northern District of Nos. 06-2001, 06-2003, 06-2005 ] Illinois, Eastern Division. and 06-2108 v. ] ] No. 04 CR 495 HARRY GILMORE, EDDIE BELL, PATRICK ] BRAY and TROY MARTIN, ] Rebecca R. Pallmeyer, Defendants-Appellants. ] Judge.

The following are before the court:

1. APPELLANT’S MOTION TO CORRECT FACTUAL ERROR IN COURT’S OPINION ISSUED ON JULY 24, 2006, filed on July 24, 2006, by counsel for appellant Patrick Bray.

2. GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE TO PATRICK BRAY’S MOTION TO CORRECT FACTUAL ERROR IN COURT’S OPINION ISSUED ON JULY 24, 2006, filed on July 28, 2006, by counsel for the appellee.

IT IS ORDERED that#1 is GRANTED. This opinion is AMENDED as follows:

On page six of the slip opinion, the second sentence of the first full paragraph shall read: “Martin’s counsel even stated (and Bray’s counsel joined him) when moving for a mistrial: “I am sure this was not intentional. I am not making any kind of accusation.”“

Reference

Status
Published