United States v. Johnson
United States v. Johnson
183 F. App'x 584
United States v. Johnson
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
On Paladino remand, the district judge stated that he would have imposed the same guidelines sentence that he imposed originally had he known that the guidelines were merely advisory and not mandatory. Such a resentence is presumptively reasonable and in this case the presumption has not been rebutted, the judge having fully considered the defendant’s arguments for a lower standard in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.