United States v. Jesse Johnson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Per Curiam

United States v. Jesse Johnson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted February 9, 2009 Decided February 9, 2009

Before

Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

Hon. JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

Hon. ILANA D. ROVNER, Circuit Judge

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appeal from the United States Plaintiff‐Appellee, District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 08‐2371 No. 00 CR 142 JESSE J. JOHNSON, Defendant‐Appellant. Elaine E. Bucklo, Judge.

ORDER

Jesse Johnson pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine and crack cocaine with intent to distribute, and was sentenced to 188 months imprisonment. On March 14, 2002, this Court affirmed Johnson’s conviction and sentence. A few years later, the defendant filed a pro se motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) in light of the Sentencing Commission’s retroactive amendments to the crack cocaine guidelines. In his motion, Johnson No. 08‐2371 Page 2

claimed that the district court had authority to reduce his sentence below the two offense‐level reduction authorized by the Sentencing Commission. The district court rejected defendant’s contention in this regard, reducing Johnson’s sentence only by the two levels allowed in the retroactive amendments. Johnson now appeals.

Our recent opinion in United States v. Cunningham, No. 08‐2901 (7th Cir. Feb. 4, 2009) dealt with this same issue. In that case, we concluded that, with an exception not relevant here, district courts do not have authority to reduce a defendant’s sentence under § 3582(c)(2) to a sentence lower than the retroactive Guideline amendment range. We adopt the reasoning and holding of that case, and therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

Reference

Status
Unpublished