Hasan, Zafar v. Foley & Lardner LLP

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Per Curiam

Hasan, Zafar v. Foley & Lardner LLP

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

January 21, 2009

Before

JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge

KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge No. 07‐3025 ZAFAR HASAN, Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Northern

Plaintiff‐Appellant, District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

v. No. 04 C 5690 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP, James B. Zagel, Judge.

Defendant‐Appellee.

O R D E R

The Motion for Leave to Intervene and Petition for Rehearing is treated as a motion by a non‐party to correct the opinion.

The motion is granted. The second sentence of Page 13, “Part B,” is amended to read:

Those facts include Simon’s anti‐Muslim comments, Hagerman’s advice,

Mason’s warning to Jaspan about Mr. Hasan’s religion, the suspicious timing of

the downturn in his hours and evaluations following September 11, one partner’s No. 07-3025 Page 2

testimony that Foley fired no other associates for economic reasons and did well

financially in 2001 and 2002, the Business Law Department’s treatment of its

other Muslim associates and Foley’s shifting justifications for firing Mr. Hasan.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Reference

Status
Published