NONPRECEDENTIALȱDISPOSITION Toȱbeȱcitedȱonlyȱinȱaccordanceȱwithȱ Fed.ȱR.ȱApp.ȱP.ȱ32.1

United States Court of Appeals ForȱtheȱSeventhȱCircuit Chicago,ȱIllinoisȱ60604 SubmittedȱOctoberȱ5,ȱ2009 DecidedȱOctoberȱ6,ȱ2009 Before WILLIAMȱJ.ȱBAUER,ȱCircuitȱJudge ȱȱȱ ILANAȱDIAMONDȱROVNER,ȱCircuitȱJudge ȱȱȱ DIANEȱS.ȱSYKES,ȱCircuitȱJudge No.ȱ08Ȭ3821 AppealȱfromȱtheȱUnitedȱStatesȱDistrictȱ UNITEDȱSTATESȱOFȱAMERICA, CourtȱforȱtheȱNorthernȱDistrictȱofȱIndiana, PlaintiffȬAppellee, SouthȱBendȱDivision.ȱ v. No.ȱ3:08ȬCRȬ00066 RAYSHAWNȱA.ȱHOLLOWAY, RobertȱL.ȱMiller,ȱJr., DefendantȬAppellant. ChiefȱJudge.

OȱRȱDȱEȱR RayshawnȱHollowayȱpleadedȱguiltyȱtoȱtwoȱcountsȱofȱbankȱrobbery.ȱȱSeeȱ18ȱU.S.C. §ȱ2113(a).ȱȱInȱhisȱpleaȱagreement,ȱheȱpromisedȱtoȱforgoȱanyȱappealȱofȱhisȱconvictionȱor sentence.ȱȱTheȱdistrictȱcourtȱsentencedȱhimȱtoȱconcurrent,ȱ120Ȭmonthȱtermsȱof imprisonment.ȱȱHollowayȱappeals,ȱbutȱhisȱappointedȱcounselȱhasȱmovedȱtoȱwithdraw becauseȱheȱcannotȱidentifyȱanyȱnonfrivolousȱargumentȱtoȱpursue.ȱȱSeeȱAndersȱv.ȱCalifornia, 386ȱU.S.ȱ738ȱ(1967).ȱȱHollowayȱopposesȱdismissalȱofȱhisȱappeal.ȱȱSeeȱCIR.ȱR.ȱ51(b).ȱ InȱhisȱRuleȱ51(b)ȱresponse,ȱHollowayȱproposesȱtoȱchallengeȱhisȱsentenceȱbutȱinforms usȱthatȱheȱdoesȱnotȱwishȱtoȱhaveȱhisȱguiltyȱpleaȱsetȱaside.ȱȱCounselȱthusȱappropriatelyȱomits anyȱdiscussionȱaboutȱtheȱadequacyȱofȱtheȱpleaȱcolloquyȱorȱtheȱvoluntarinessȱofȱtheȱguilty plea.ȱȱSeeȱUnitedȱStatesȱv.ȱKnox,ȱ287ȱF.3dȱ667,ȱ670Ȭ71ȱ(7thȱCir.ȱ2002).ȱȱButȱbecauseȱtheȱappeal waiverȱinȱtheȱpleaȱagreementȱstandsȱorȱfallsȱwithȱtheȱguiltyȱplea,ȱUnitedȱStatesȱv.ȱWilson, No.ȱ08Ȭ3821 Pageȱ2 481ȱF.3dȱ475,ȱ483ȱ(7thȱCir.ȱ2007);ȱUnitedȱStatesȱv.ȱNave,ȱ302ȱF.3dȱ719,ȱ721ȱ(7thȱCir.ȱ2002); UnitedȱStatesȱv.ȱHare,ȱ269ȱF.3dȱ859,ȱ860Ȭ61ȱ(7thȱCir.ȱ2001),ȱanyȱappellateȱissueȱconcerning Holloway’sȱsentenceȱwouldȱbeȱfrivolous.ȱȱ Accordingly,ȱweȱGRANTȱcounsel’sȱmotionȱtoȱwithdrawȱandȱDISMISSȱtheȱappeal.ȱȱ