United States v. Ray Longstreet

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Per Curiam

United States v. Ray Longstreet

Opinion

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted December 22, 2009 Decided January 12, 2010

Before

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

Nos. 07-1657 & 07-2685 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, of Illinois, Eastern Division. Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 05 CR 471 v. Matthew F. Kennelly, RAY LONGSTREET and MICHAEL Judge. ERVIN, Defendants-Appellants.

ORDER

On June 8, 2009, we ordered these cases be returned to the district court on limited remand to query whether the district court wanted to resentence Ray Longstreet and Michael Ervin in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007). On December 22, 2009, the district court communicated its desire to resentence the defendants. Accordingly, we V ACATE Ray Longstreet’s and Michael Ervin’s sentences and R EMAND their cases to the district court for resentencing.

Reference

Status
Unpublished