U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 2010

United States v. Rodriguez Jones

United States v. Rodriguez Jones
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Decided February 16, 2010 · Bauer, Rovner, Williams
365 F. App'x 29

Counsel

Joseph H. Hartzler, Office of the United States Attorney, Springfield, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Rodriguez D. Jones, Coleman, FL, pro se.

United States v. Rodriguez Jones

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

The defendant-appellant, Rodriguez Jones, sought a reduction of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 591 of the Sentencing Commission policy. That Amendment was in effect at the time of Jones’ sentencing and, under its terms, the district court was not authorized to reduce the term of imprisonment already imposed. Therefore the case should have been dismissed for want of subject matter jurisdiction. We construe the denial of the relief sought as a dismissal for want of subject matter jurisdiction and summarily affirm such dismissal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.