Kevin Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Perfor

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Kevin Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Perfor

Opinion

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 26, 2011

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

FREDERICK J. KAPALA, District Judge*

No. 08‐2820

KEVIN KASTEN, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v.

SAINT‐GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS CORP., Defendant‐Appellee.

___________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. No. 07‐C‐0686—Barbara B. Crabb, Judge.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court No. 09‐834

* The Honorable Frederick J. Kapala, of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation. No. 10‐2820 Page 2

___________________________ ORDER On March 22, 2011, the Supreme Court reversed our decision in this case and remanded the matter for proceedings in conformity with its opinion. Kasten v. Saint‐Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., 131 S.Ct. 1325 (2011). In light of that opinion – concluding that oral complaints fall within the scope of the phrase “filed any complaint” in 29 U.S.C. § 215(a)(3) – it is ORDERED that this case be remanded to the district court for further proceedings pertaining to Kasten’s antiretaliation claim under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Reference

Status
Unpublished