Peggy S. LeGrande v. United States
Peggy S. LeGrande v. United States
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Argued October 26, 2011 Decided August 14, 2012
Before KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, District Judge* No. 11‐2205 PEGGY S. LEGRANDE, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Plaintiff‐Appellant, District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
v. No. 1:08‐cv‐02047 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Joan B. Gottschall, Judge.
Defendant‐Appellee.
O R D E R The court, on its own motion, amends the text of the original opinion. See LeGrande v. United States, No. 11‐2205, 2012 WL 2913730 (7th Cir. July 18, 2012). The following sentence, appearing on page 26 of the slip opinion and at *9 of 2012 WL
* The Honorable Sue E. Myerscough of the Central District of Illinois, sitting by designation.
No. 11‐2205 Page 2 2913730, should be removed: “The Supreme Court has held that this requirement is jurisdictional and not subject to waiver. McNeil v. United States, 508 U.S. 106, 112‐13 (1993).”
Additionally, the sentence quoting McNeil, which appears on page 28 of the slip opinion and at *10 of 2012 WL 2913730, should be amended. It currently reads: “As the Supreme Court noted in McNeil, the statutory threshold requirement of filing an administrative claim with the appropriate agency is clear and cannot be characterized as a ‘trap for the unwary.’ 508 U.S. at 113.” As amended it should read: “As the Supreme Court noted in McNeil v. United States, 508 U.S. 106, 113 (1993), the statutory threshold requirement of filing an administrative claim with the appropriate agency is clear and cannot be characterized as a ‘trap for the unwary.’”
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.