U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 2013

United States v. Sedgwick Johnson

United States v. Sedgwick Johnson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Decided October 25, 2013 · PerCuriam

United States v. Sedgwick Johnson

Opinion

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 October 25, 2013 Before RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge No. 03‐1322 Appeal from the United States District UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Court for the Northern District of Plaintiff‐Appellee, Illinois, Eastern Division.

v. No. 01 CR 543‐3 SEDGWICK JOHNSON, James F. Holderman, Defendant‐Appellant. Judge.

ORDER We issued a limited remand in this case to inquire whether the district court would impose the same 360‐month sentence on Sedgwick Johnson if it knew the full extent of its discretion. After considering both parties’ positions, the district court has responded that it would reimpose the same sentence. Accordingly, there was no plain error in Johnson’s sentence, see United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir. 2005), and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.