Royce Brown v. John F. Caraway
Royce Brown v. John F. Caraway
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 May 13, 2013 Amended May 16, 2013
Before
FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge
No. 12-1439 Appeal from the United ROYCE BROWN, States District Court for the Petitioner-Appellant, Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division. v. No. 2:12-cv-28-WTL-WGH JOHN F. CARAWAY, Warden, William T. Lawrence, Judge. Respondent-Appellee.
Order
Chief Judge Easterbrook’s statement issued on May 10, 2013, is amended as follows:
Page 32, line 13, “Begay and Engel” should be “Bousley and Engel”;
Page 32, line 25, “Begay and Engel” should be “Bousley and Engel”;
Page 32, 2nd paragraph, line 1, “Begay has a proviso” should be “Bousley has a proviso”; and
Page 36, 1st full paragraph, “Even if Begay were constitutional, and this were Brown’s first collateral attack” should be revised to begin: “Even if this were Brown’s first collateral attack”.
Reference
- Status
- Published