Warnether Muhammad v. Caterpillar Inc.
Warnether Muhammad v. Caterpillar Inc.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
October 16, 2014
Before
FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge
ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge
No. 12‐1723
WARNETHER A. MUHAMMAD, Appeal from the United States District Court Plaintiff‐Appellant, for the Central District of Illinois.
v. No. 09‐cv‐2172
CATERPILLAR, INCORPORATED, Michael P. McCuskey, Judge. Defendant‐Appellee.
O R D E R
On consideration of the Petition For Panel Rehearing filed by Plaintiff‐Appellant on October 7, 2014, all members of the original panel have voted to DENY the Petition For Panel Rehearing.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition For Panel Rehearing is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the opinion issued in the above‐entitled case on September 9, 2014, is hereby amended as follows:
On page 5: in the second full paragraph, the last sentence starting “We are not persuaded ...” is deleted; Appeal no. 12‐1723 Page 2
On pages 5‐6: the last paragraph of page 5 (starting “First, Muhammad’s argument ...”) ending on page 6 is deleted.
On page 6: the first sentence of the first full paragraph is modified so that “Second, even if we set that problem aside, another more” is replaced by “A”, so that the sentence reads “A fundamental obstacle ....”
On page 8: the first full paragraph (starting “The first problem is ...”) is deleted, and the first two sentences of the second full paragraph are deleted, such that the second full paragraph begins with “Muhammad has not identified ...”
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Published