U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 2019

Paul Regains v. City of Chicago

Paul Regains v. City of Chicago
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Decided April 17, 2019 · Per Curiam

Paul Regains v. City of Chicago

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

April 17, 2019

Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge PAMELA PEPPER, District Judge*

No. 15-2444 Appeal from the United States District Court for PAUL REGAINS, the Northern District of Plaintiff-Appellant, Illinois, Eastern Division. v. No. 14 C 9687 CITY OF CHICAGO, James B. Zagel, Judge.

Defendant-Appellee.

Order The opinion of this court issued March 13, 2019, is amended as follows: Page 2, carryover paragraph, eighth line, “failing to a report a” is replaced by “failing to report a” Page 5, carryover paragraph, fifth line, “in custody until his December 3, 2012 trial—” is replaced by “in custody until his December 3, 2013 trial—” * Of the Eastern District of Wisconsin, sitting by designation.

No. 15-2444 Page 2

Page 7, second full paragraph, second and third lines, “He was arraigned and detained by lawful process on September 4, 2012;” is replaced by “He was arraigned and detained by lawful process on September 3, 2012, or earlier;” Page 7, second full paragraph, eighth line, “on December 3, 2012— the date he was acquitted.” is replaced by “on December 3, 2013—the date he was acquitted.”

Page 7, second full paragraph, tenth line, “claims properly fell” is replaced by “claim properly fell” Page 8, carryover paragraph, tenth and eleventh lines, “December 3, 2012,” is replaced by “December 3, 2013,” Page 12, first full paragraph, third line, “or marshal proof the proof at summary judgment” is replaced by “or marshal proof at summary judgment” Page 12, first full paragraph, tenth line, “To state a Monell claim,” is replaced by “To prove a Monell claim,”.

Plaintiff-appellant filed a petition for rehearing on March 27, 2019. All of the judges on the panel have voted to deny rehearing. The petition for rehearing is therefore DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.