United States v. Jomo Hill

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Per Curiam

United States v. Jomo Hill

Opinion

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

Argued October 2, 2019 Decided October 16, 2019

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

No. 18‐3164

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff‐Appellee, Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

v. No. 2:18‐CR‐101‐1‐JPS

JOMO K. HILL, J. P. Stadtmueller, Defendant‐Appellant. Judge.

ORDER

Jomo K. Hill pleaded guilty to robbery and brandishing a firearm. Before his sentencing hearing, the district court circulated a list of proposed conditions of supervision. At the hearing, the district court pronounced his sentence and incorporated those conditions by reference. On appeal, Hill initially argued that the district court procedurally erred by incorporating the circulated list of conditions without adding it to the record. After his opening brief, however, the district court supplemented the record with that list, curing any procedural defect. This appeal is therefore moot. We decline the defendant’s invitation to issue an advisory order to clarify the proper procedure for incorporating conditions. DISMISSED

Reference

Status
Unpublished