Phillip Lay v. Andrew M. Saul

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Per Curiam

Phillip Lay v. Andrew M. Saul

Opinion

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Argued January 29, 2020 Decided January 29, 2020

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Circuit Judge

No. 19-1893 Appeal from the United States District Court for the PHILLIP LAY, Northern District of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellant, Eastern Division. v. No. 17 CV 8285 ANDREW M. SAUL, Young B. Kim, Commissioner of Social Security, Magistrate Judge. Defendant-Appellee.

Order

Phillip Lay’s application for disability benefits under the Social Security Act was re- jected administratively, with review culminating in an adverse decision by an adminis- trative law judge. The dispute moved to district court, where the parties agreed to have a magistrate judge make the final decision. 28 U.S.C. §636(c). The magistrate judge con- cluded that the ALJ’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and does not reflect a material legal error. 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41780 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 14, 2019). We substan- tially agree with the magistrate judge’s analysis, and on that basis the judgment is

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished