U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1893

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Conley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided February 20, 1893 · Caldwell, Sanborn, Thayer

54 F. 486; 4 C.C.A. 460; 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1471

Counsel

E. D. Kenna, J. W. Terry, and C. L. Jackson, for plaintiff in error., Isaac H. Orr and H. L. Christie, for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

City of Columbus v. Woonsocket Institution of Savings (5th Cir. 1902)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This case was submitted without oral argument, on the assumption, no doubt, that it presents the same state of facts and the same questions of law which were considered in the cases of Railway Co. v. Wal*487lace, 54 Fed. Rep. 485, and Railway Co. v. Seifred, Id. 485, (decided at the December term of this court, at Little Rock, Ark.,) in which the same counsel were engaged. We have examined the record, and have reached the conclusion that such assumption on the part of counsel is correct, and that the judgment must be affirmed, in conformity with the opinion announced in those cases.

It is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.