U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1895

Pierce v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.

Pierce v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided February 20, 1895 · Caldwell, Sanborn, Thayer
66 F. 44; 13 C.C.A. 323; 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2293

Counsel

Charles A. Clark, for plaintiff in error., John H. Baldwin filed brief for defendant in error.

Pierce v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The facts iu this case are the same in all essential particulars as were those in the case of Railway Co. v. Artist, 9 C. C. A . 14, 60 Fed. 365; and the judgment below is affirmed, with costs, on the authority of that case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.