U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1895

Drexel v. Northwestern Terra Cotta Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided September 30, 1895 · Caldwell, Cardwell, Sanborn, Thayer

70 F. 219; 16 C.C.A. 678; 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2493

Counsel

II. C. Brome and B. G. Burbank, for plaintiffs in error., W. W. Morsman (Smith McPherson and J. M. Junkin, on the brief), for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Rosatto (3d Cir. 1908)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

CALDWELL, Circuit Judge.

In this case the suit was on the same bond that was sued oil, in Carnegie, Phipps & Co. v. Hulbert (No. 475) 70 Fed. 209, but the lower court in tills case rendered judgment for the plaintiff upon the ground that it was named as the obligee in the bond. On the authority of Carnegie, Phipps & Co. v. Hulbert, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.