U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1899

Hood v. Wallace

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided October 30, 1899 · Caldwell, Sanborn, Thayer

97 F. 983; 38 C.C.A. 692; 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2677

Counsel

Sterry (Eugene Hagan and I. E. Lambert, on the brief), for plaintiff in error., W. C. Cochran (J. McD. Trimble and W. H. Wallace, on the brief), for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Salter v. Williams (District Court, D. New Jersey 1914)
Roth v. Hood (6th Cir. 1939)
Gallin v. National City Bank (New York Supreme Court 1934)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

THAYER, Circuit Judge.

This case was submitted at the same time, by the same counsel, on the same argument, and involves the same questions, which have been considered and decided in the preceding case of Lantry v. Wallace (C. C. A.) 97 Fed. 865. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment in the ease in hand is affirmed; Judge SANBORN dissenting.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.