Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City Trust Co.
Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City Trust Co.
Opinion of the Court
These cases involve the right of appellants, the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company and the Stanley Coal Company, as creditors of the Sedalia Light & Traction Company, to an equitable preference over the lien of prior mortgage bondholders. In a suit by the trustee to foreclose the mortgage upon the physical property and the franchises and income of .the traction company, the appellants intervened for a preference, but the trial court sustained demurrers to their petitions. The petitions disclose the following; The claim of the railway company is for repairs to a cross
It is well settled that a railroad mortgagee impliedly agrees that the current debts incurred in the ordinary course of the mortgagor’s business shall be paid from current income before his claim thereto attaches. It is immaterial that the creditor has not reduced his claim to judgment or that it arose and was not asserted before the mortgagee impounded the income in a suit to foreclose. The operation of the property in the ordinary course is essential to the very life of the franchises of the mortgagor, to the value of the property embraced in the mortgage, and to the performance of the obligations of the mortgagor to the public. That it be operated is to the advantage, of the mortgagee and he is held to have so contemplated and to have consented to the necessary attendant current expense. So when labor, materials, and supplies are furnished, not on the personal credit of the mortgagor, but with the expectation or understanding that they will be paid for out of current income, the creditor has an equity superior to the lien of the mortgagee and the bondholders he represents which is not destroyed by the appointment of receivers. Where such claims are not paid and there has been a diversion of income to the betterment or improvement of the mortgaged property, and therefore-to the benefit of the bondholders, or to the payment of interest to them, equity may require restoration when the mortgage is being foreclosed. These principles have been frequently expressed. See Rodger Ballast Car Co. v. Railroad, 83 C. C. A. 403, 154 Fed. 629, and cases cited. The interveners aver that an excess of income; sufficient to discharge their claims, both before and after the receivers took charge, was diverted to the benefit of the bondholders and also is now in the possession of the receivers. It is not necessary therefore to consider
The decrees are reversed, and the causes remanded for further proceedings.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- MISSOURI, K. & T. RY. CO. v. CITY TRUST CO. STANLEY v. SAME
- Status
- Published