U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1918

Alsop v. McCombs

Alsop v. McCombs
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided April 25, 1918 · Stone
253 F. 949; 165 C.C.A. 391; 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1622

Counsel

Chester H. Krum, of St. Eouis, Mo. (George W. Jolly, of Owensboro, Ky., on the brief), for plaintiff in error., Jeffries & Corum, of St. Louis, Mo., and Oliver & Oliver, of Cape Girardeau, Mo., for defendants in error.

Alsop v. McCombs

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

STONE, Circuit Judge.

Suit upon contract for damages. From a judgment upon a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s evidence a writ of error was taken.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence he moved the court for a voluntary nonsuit, which was denied. This was followed by a statement by the court that a verdict would be directed. Again plaintiff moved for nonsuit, which was denied. The sole error assigned is the refusal to grant the nonsuit. Under the “conformity statute” (R. S. § 914 [Comp. St. 1916, § 1537]), the practice of the state courts must govern. Section 1980, Revised Statutes of Missouri 1909, provides:

"The plaintiff shall be allowed to dismiss his suit or lake a nonsuit at any time before the same is finally submitted to the jury, or to the court sitting as a jury, or to the court, and not afterward.”

*950This court, in Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Metalstaff, 101 Fed. 769, 41 C. C. A. 669, after quoting the above statute and citing numerous Missouri cases, decided that the plaintiff might “take a nonsuit at any time before the jury has actually retired.”

The judgment is reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.