U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1953

Automatic Equipment Manufacturing Corporation v. R. A. Goodall

Automatic Equipment Manufacturing Corporation v. R. A. Goodall
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided March 23, 1953 · Per Curiam
202 F.2d 955; 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3323 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Charles S. Reed and William A. Sawtell, Jr., Omaha, Neb., for appellant., Raymond M. Crossman, Omaha, Neb., G. J. McGinley, Ogallala, Neb., James W. R. Brown and R. B. Hamer, Omaha, Neb., for appellees.

Automatic Equipment Manufacturing Corporation v. R. A. Goodall

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision. The 3 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court, 106 F.Supp. 699, dismissed at cost of appellant but without allowance or taxation of costs to any of the appellees, on stipulation of parties.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.