U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1963

L. Gilbert Cohen v. Time, Inc., and Life Circulation Co.

L. Gilbert Cohen v. Time, Inc., and Life Circulation Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided February 12, 1963 · Vogel, Blackmun, Ridge
312 F.2d 747 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

L. Gilbert Cohen, Minneapolis, Minn., made argument and filed brief pro se., Edward J. Schwartzbauer, Minneapolis, Minn., made argument for appellees and Curtis D. Forslund and Dorsey Owen, Mar quart, Windhorst & West, Minneapolis, Minn., were on the brief with him.

L. Gilbert Cohen v. Time, Inc., and Life Circulation Co.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an action to recover treble damages under the Sherman and Clayton Anti-Trust Laws, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1, et seq., and 15 U.S.C.A. § 12 et seq. Plaintiff-appellant, who has appeared in the District Court and here pro se, claims that Time and Life were parties to a conspiracy among various publishers to allocate the sponsored circulations market to themselves.

Time and Life moved for summary judgment, basing their motion on interrogatories, depositions, correspondence' between the parties and affidavits of Time' and Life employees. Nothing was introduced in behalf of the appellant to counteract the showing by the appellees. In a cogent and carefully detailed opinion, the District Court fully demonstrated the non-existence of any genuine issue of fact and accordingly granted appellees’ motion. No purpose could be served in the reiteration here of the reasons given by the District Court and accordingly we affirm on the basis of its opinion, Cohen v. Curtis Pub. Co., D.C. 31 F.R.D. 569.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.