U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1970

National Labor Relations Board v. Autotronics, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided December 7, 1970 · Matthes, Lay, Register

434 F.2d 651; 76 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2121; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6105 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

John J. Burgoyne, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner., No brief was filed by counsel for respondent nor was oral argument made by counsel for respondent when the case was presented to the Court for submission on November 18, 1970.

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

National Labor Relations Board v. Globe Security Services, Inc. (3d Cir. 1977)
National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio (2d Cir. 1987)
Ahrens Aircraft, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (1st Cir. 1983)
National Labor Relations Board v. Highview, Incorporated (5th Cir. 1979)
National Labor Relations Board v. Laborers International Union of North America, Afl-Cio, Local 282, and Alberici-Fruin-Colnon (8th Cir. 1977)
National Labor Relations Board v. Family Heritage Home-Beaver Dam, Inc. (7th Cir. 1974)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding substantial evidence from the record as a whole, we grant enforcement of the Board’s order against Autotronics, Inc. arising from the company’s violations of § 8(a) (1) and § 8(a) (5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act.

It is alleged by way of answer to the Board’s application for enforcement of its order that the company has undergone Chapter XI pi'oceedings in the district court and that new ownership and management have resulted. This fact does not alter this court’s jurisdiction to review the merits of the Board’s order or to consider enforcement of it. Southport Petroleum Co. v. NLRB, 315 U.S. 100, 62 S.Ct. 452, 86 L.Ed. 718 (1942). The Board may, if necessary, consider in a subsequent proceeding whether it is impossible for the employer against whom the Board’s order now runs to comply with enforcement. Cf. NLRB v. Aircraft Engineering Corp., 419 F.2d 1303, 1304 (8 Cir. 1970). And see Cap Santa Vue, Inc. v. NLRB, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 395, 424 F.2d 883 (1970); NLRB v. Kostilnik, 405 F.2d 733 (3 Cir. 1969); Webb Tractor & Equip. Co., 181 N.L.R.B. No. 39 (1970).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.