Walter C. Peebles v. Paul Bishop and Juris Stals
Opinion
Appellant, Walter C. Peebles, brought an action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1343 (1970) in conjunction with 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1970), alleging that appellees Paul Bishop and *650 Juris Stals violated appellant’s Eighth Amendment right against cruel and unusual punishment. Appellant claimed that appellees, who were correctional officers employed by the St. Louis County Jail, deliberately failed to remove appellant from his jail cell after a fire had started in the cell. 1 Appellant requested damages of one million dollars. The case was tried to the court 2 without a jury. In a detailed and carefully considered opinion published at 428 F.Supp. 864, Judge Nangle found in favor of appellees. This appeal followed.
We have examined the record and briefs and are convinced that the trial court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and that it applied correct principles of law to the factual issues presented. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of Judge Nan-gle’s opinion.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Walter C. PEEBLES, Appellant, v. Paul BISHOP and Juris Stals, Appellees
- Status
- Published