Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Crum & Forster Insurance Co.
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Mid-Century Insurance Co. of Texas v. Lindsey (Tex. 1999)
- Wausau Underwriters Insurance v. Howser (District Court, D. South Carolina 1990)
- Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. of Connecticut v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. (Minn. Ct. App. 1984)
- Scherschlight v. Empire Fire & Marine Insurance (District Court, D. South Dakota 1980)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
This appeal involves a dispute between two insurance carriers over which one is liable for damages arising from a hunting accident. The accident occurred when a shotgun being held by James Bergerud, Jr., an insured under a farm liability policy issued by Farm Bureau, discharged and injured another member of a deer hunting party. At the time of the accident, the hunting party was in the box of a pickup truck operated by Gary Jacobson, an insured under an automobile liability policy issued by Crum & Forster. The injured hunter filed suit against both Bergerud and Jacobson. A settlement was negotiated, with Farm Bureau paying its policy limits of $25,000, and Crum & Forster contributing $5,000.
Farm Bureau then filed suit for indemnity against Crum & Forster. The facts were stipulated. The District Court, * applying Minnesota law, concluded that the hunting accident had not arisen out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of the motor vehicle insured' by Crum & Forster, and judgment was entered dismissing the complaint. This appeal followed.
*40 The judgment is affirmed on the basis of Judge Devitt’s well-reasoned opinion. See 8th Cir. Rule 14.
Affirmed.
The Honorable Edward J. Devitt, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.