Russell v. Board of Trustees
Opinion of the Court
Raymond Russell appeals the District Court’s
The District Court held in a thorough opinion, Russell v. Board of Trustees of University of Arkansas, 502 F.Supp. 916 (E.D.Ark. 1980), that Russell had a “property interest” entitled to protection under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, but that he had received all the process that was his due. The District Court held in particular that the Board had taken reasonable steps to give Russell appropriate notice of its action. We affirm, substantially for the reasons given by the District Court. See 8th Cir.R. 14. The action of the Board of Trustees was quasi-legislative, and Russell received at least as much notice as was required.
Affirmed.
. The Hon. Garnett Thomas Eisele, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Raymond RUSSELL v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS, Specifically, Raymond P. Miller, M.D., Chairman, Lewis L. Ramsay, Jr., Bradley D. Jesson, Kaneaster Hodges, Diane Nolan, Jacqueline Douglas, Ph.D., Robert Pugh, Hugh B. Chalmers, Jack Williams, Hall McAdams, III, and Herman Smith, Chancellor, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published