Taylor v. West Publishing Co.
Taylor v. West Publishing Co.
Opinion of the Court
Terry Ray Taylor appeals pro se from the district court’s
The district court held that West Publishing Co. was cloaked with, absolute immunity from suit for libel in publishing verbatim judicial opinions. See Lowenschuss v. West Publishing Co., 542 F.2d 180 (3d Cir. 1976). The court further held that Judge Simpson’s act of writing the opinion in Taylor v. Gibson was a judicial act within the jurisdiction of the court and thus absolutely privileged. See Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 355-57, 98 S.Ct. 1099, 1104-05, 55 L.Ed.2d 331 (1978).
After reviewing the record in this case, we have concluded the district court did not err either legally or factually in dismissing this case and refusing to add Judge Simpson as a defendant. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of the district court's well-reasoned opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 14.
. The Honorable Diana E. Murphy, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.