U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1989

In the Matter of James Lee Hartley, Debtor. James Lee Hartley v. Rickey D. Jones

In the Matter of James Lee Hartley, Debtor. James Lee Hartley v. Rickey D. Jones
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided May 17, 1989 · Lay, Henley, McMillian, Arnold, Gibson, Fagg, Bowman, Wollman, Magill, Beam
874 F.2d 1254; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6949; 1989 WL 51763 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Keith R. Krueger, Kansas City, Mo., for appellant., Julia J. Borel, Kansas City, Mo., for ap-pellee.

In the Matter of James Lee Hartley, Debtor. James Lee Hartley v. Rickey D. Jones

Cases that cite this one

17 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

The petition of appellee for rehearing en banc was granted, thereby vacating the panel opinion, and this case now has been reheard by the Court en banc. Judges John R. Gibson, Bowman, Wollman, Magill, and Beam vote to affirm the judgment of the District Court. Chief Judge Lay and Judges Henley, McMillian, Arnold, and Fagg vote to reverse that judgment. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.