In the Matter of James Lee Hartley, Debtor. James Lee Hartley v. Rickey D. Jones
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Paul W. Geiger, Debtor. Paul W. Geiger v. Margaret Kawaauhau and Solomon Kawaauhau (8th Cir. 1996)
- North Tel, Inc. v. Brandl (In re Brandl) (Bankr. D. Minn. 1995)
- White v. Grisham (In re Grisham) (United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri 1995)
- Fischer v. Hanson (In re Hanson) (Bankr. D. Minn. 1994)
- Kawaauhau v. Geiger (In re Geiger) (United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri 1994)
- Merritt v. Thompson (In re Thompson) (United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan 1993)
- Rupert v. Krautheimer (In re Krautheimer) (United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York 1999)
- O'Brien v. Zangara (In re Zangara) (United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York 1998)
- Rupert v. Krautheimer (In re Krautheimer) (United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York 1997)
- Brzys v. Lubanski (In re Lubanski) (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts 1995)
- Vaughn v. Quinn (In re Quinn) (United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri 1995)
- Ford v. Buckallew (In re Buckallew) (District Court, W.D. Missouri 1994)
- ITT Life Insurance Corp. v. Haakenson (In re Haakenson) (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota 1993)
- Wood Peek v. Mazander (In re Mazander) (United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri 1991)
- Cablevision Systems Corp. v. Cohen (In re Cohen) (United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York 1990)
- American Charter Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Harris (In re Harris) (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska 1989)
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Lombre (In re Lombre) (District Court, W.D. Missouri 1989)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The petition of appellee for rehearing en banc was granted, thereby vacating the panel opinion, and this case now has been reheard by the Court en banc. Judges John R. Gibson, Bowman, Wollman, Magill, and Beam vote to affirm the judgment of the District Court. Chief Judge Lay and Judges Henley, McMillian, Arnold, and Fagg vote to reverse that judgment. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.