U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1989

United States v. James Neavill

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided October 5, 1989 · Lay, McMillian, Arnold, Gibson, Fagg, Bowman, Wollman, Magill, Beam

886 F.2d 220; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15184; 1989 WL 115430 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

David H. Rubin, St. Louis, Mo., for appellant., Steven E. Holtshouser, St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Herman Campbell Barnett, Jr. (11th Cir. 1992)
United States v. Kolby Kristiansen (8th Cir. 1990)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By an order previously entered, the petition for rehearing en banc filed by the United States was granted. Thus, the panel opinion previously filed, United States v. Neavill, 868 F.2d 1000 (8th Cir. 1989), was vacated by operation of law. Now pending before the Court en banc is Neavill’s appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the District Court.

Neavill has filed a motion to dismiss his own appeal. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. This action, of course, leaves in effect the judgment of conviction, which is final and not subject to further review on appeal.

It is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.