The Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul filed a complaint in Minnesota state court against Marvin and Geraldine Finstrom seeking restitution of real estate purchased by the bank at a mortgage foreclosure sale. The Finstroms removed the case to federal district court claiming the bank had violated their constitutional rights and their rights under the 1987 Agricultural Credit Act. The district court, on its own motion, remanded the case to state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), concluding it did not have original federal question or diversity jurisdiction, or removal jurisdiction. This appeal followed.

Remand orders “issued under § 1447(c) and invoking the grounds specified therein — that removal was improvident and without jurisdiction — are immune from review under § 1447(d).” Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. Hermandsdorfer, 423 U.S. 336, 346, 96 S.Ct. 584, 590, 46 L.Ed.2d 542 (1976). See also First Nat’l Bank v. Wright, 775 F.2d 245, 246-47 (8th Cir. 1985). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See 8th Cir.R. 12(a).