U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1991

United States v. Steve Milbourn, D/B/A Grand Island Beauty School

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided November 25, 1991 · Lay, Gibson, McMillian

948 F.2d 1088; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 27982; 1991 WL 247408 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Richard Gee, Grand Island, Neb., argued, for appellant., Robert Kokrda, Omaha, Neb., argued, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Walter E. Brewer and Brian E. Honel (10th Cir. 1993)
United States v. Elvin Leon Hibbs (10th Cir. 1993)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

Before LAY, Chief Judge, FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge, and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from the district court’s order that the defendant pay restitution in the amount of $194,865.30 for all losses incurred by financial institutions in a mail fraud scheme to which the defendant pled guilty on two counts which totalled $3,509.66 in losses. On appeal the defendant asserts that restitution should be limited to the specific acts included in the counts to which the defendant pled guilty. See United States v. Marsh, 932 F.2d 710 (8th Cir. 1991) (citing Hughey v. United States, 495 U.S. 411, 110 S.Ct. 1979, 109 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990)).

On appeal the government has conceded error and requests the case be remanded to the district court to reduce the amount of restitution to be made to $3,509.66.

It is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.