U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1992

Vail v. Derwinski

Vail v. Derwinski
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided February 10, 1992
956 F.2d 812; 1992 WL 23567 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Vail v. Derwinski

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied. Rehearing by the panel is also denied. The motion to certify the case to the Supreme Court of Minnesota is overruled. The panel opinion filed October 8, 1991, is hereby amended by adding footnote 11 to page 11, end of first full paragraph [946 F.2d 589, 594 (8th Cir. 1991) ], after the words “foreclosure sale” as follows:

11. After this opinion was filed, the government has called to our attention that 38 U.S.C. § 1832(a)(4)(A) was amended in 1987 imposing a duty on the agency to provide notification to the veteran upon a showing of default. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 3732(a)(4)(A) (1991).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.