Saxton v. Beamer
Saxton v. Beamer
Opinion
32 F.3d 571
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
Harry E. SAXTON; Ruth B. Saxton, Appellants,
v.
John E. BEAMER; Marlyn S. Jensen; Connie Kinser; The
Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service; Don
Waller; Leonard Pitcock; Dale Lents; Agriculture
Stabilization and Conservation Service; Commodity Credit
Corporation; Mike Epsy, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture;
Anthony Putz; Christopher Beyerhelm; Farmers Home
Administration, Appellees.
No. 93-3965.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: July 19, 1994.
Filed: August 2, 1994.
Before MAGILL, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Harry E. and Ruth B. Saxton appeal the district court's1 dismissal of their abuse-of-process complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that no error of fact or law appears and that an opinion would lack precedential value. Thus, we affirm the judgment of the district court without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny the Saxtons' motions to strike the appellees' brief.
The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.