James F. Newport v. Michelin Aircraft

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

James F. Newport v. Michelin Aircraft

Opinion

_____________

No. 94-3783WM No. 95-1417WM _____________

James Frederick Newport, * * Appellant, * * Appeals from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. Michelin Aircraft Tire, also * known as Michelin Tire * [UNPUBLISHED] Corporation, * * Appellee. * _____________

Submitted: December 22, 1995

Filed: December 29, 1995 _____________

Before FAGG, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _____________

PER CURIAM.

James Frederick Newport appeals the district court's orders dismissing three counts of his complaint and granting summary judgment on the remaining count. Having carefully considered the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude Newport is not entitled to relief. We also deny Newport's motion to dissolve the district court's protective order enjoining Newport from entering appellee's property without written consent. Discussion of the issues presented by this appeal will serve no useful purpose. We thus affirm the district court's decisions. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Reference

Status
Unpublished