Wilfred Neely v. Douglas Battery Manufacturing Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Wilfred Neely v. Douglas Battery Manufacturing Co., 68 F.3d 479 (8th Cir. 1995)
1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 34396; 1995 WL 583685

Wilfred Neely v. Douglas Battery Manufacturing Co.

Opinion

68 F.3d 479

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
Wilfred NEELY, Appellant,
v.
DOUGLAS BATTERY MANUFACTURING CO., Appellee.

No. 95-2023

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 29, 1995.
Filed: Oct. 5, 1995.

Before McMILLIAN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Wilfred Neely, an African-American, was discharged from Douglas Battery Manufacturing Company for violating company policy. Neely brought this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 2000e to 2000e-17 (1988 & Supp. V 1993), claiming his employer discriminated against him because of his race. The District Court1 granted summary judgment to the employer, and Neely appeals. Having reviewed the briefs and record, we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted, and we affirm the judgment of the District Court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri

Reference

Status
Unpublished