U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1996

Matthew Gore v. Spalding & Evenflo

Matthew Gore v. Spalding & Evenflo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided January 12, 1996

Matthew Gore v. Spalding & Evenflo

Opinion

____________ No. 95-2024 ____________

Matthew Gore, a Minor, by * and through his Father and * Next Friend, Michael Gore; * Michael Gore, * * Appellants, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri * Spalding & Evenflo Companies, * [UNPUBLISHED] Inc.; Sheila Gore, * * Appellees. * ____________ Submitted: January 8, 1996 Filed: January 12, 1996 ____________ Before MAGILL, REAVLEY*, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

This is a product liability suit. A jury verdict and judgment was entered in favor of Spalding & Evenflo Companies, Inc. The Gores appeal certain district court1 evidentiary rulings and the district court's refusal to submit a specific jury instruction.

Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that no error of law appears and that the district court

*The Honorable Thomas M. Reavley, United States Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.

The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. correctly ruled. Accordingly, the district court's judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.